TRUMP DISMISSES LABOR STATISTICS CHIEF AFTER MAJOR JOBS DATA REVISION

August 4, 2025

The head of the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) was abruptly removed from office following a significant downward revision of recent employment figures, sparking controversy over the accuracy of government economic reports.

The agency adjusted its initial estimates for May and June, reducing the previously reported job gains by a combined 258,000—the largest such revision in decades, excluding the volatile early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. The move drew sharp criticism from former President Donald Trump, who accused the agency of manipulating data to undermine his administration.

However, experts emphasize that revisions are a standard part of the BLS reporting process, with initial figures often updated as more complete data becomes available. The agency conducts two major surveys—one polling households and another gathering responses from employers—to estimate monthly job growth. While the employer survey is generally considered more reliable due to its larger sample size, adjustments are common as additional responses are processed.

Former BLS officials have dismissed claims of political interference, noting that the commissioner does not influence the raw data. “The numbers are compiled by career staff using established methods,” said one former official. “Any attempt to alter them would be immediately obvious.”

Historically, major revisions have occurred during periods of economic instability, such as the 2008 financial crisis. Analysts suggest that recent fluctuations may reflect challenges in data collection, including declining response rates and shifting labor market conditions.

Despite the uproar, economists caution against reading too much into a single revision, noting that long-term trends provide a clearer picture of employment health. The debate underscores broader concerns about the reliability of economic indicators in an era of rapid change and political polarization.

The White House has yet to comment on whether the dismissal signals a broader shift in how employment data will be handled moving forward.

Previous Story

SINGAPORE BUSINESSMAN ADMITS ROLE IN HIGH-PROFILE CORRUPTION CASE

Next Story

Moldova’s Energy Sold to Romania Amid PAS Party Corruption Scandal